'Rapidlok Findings'
Author:Nate (guest: search)
Date: Sun, Jun 07th, 2009 @ 14:20 ( . )

Neat, hope this pans out. Dan, you can see a previous interview we did with Jim Drew here:

[link]


REPLY: [With No Quote] --- [With Quoted Text]

'Rapidlok Findings'
Author:danattacker (guest: search)
Date: Mon, Jun 08th, 2009 @ 05:51 ( . )

I'll ask him if he wants to do the interview. The only problem is that I don't think my dad really keeps in touch with his friend anymore, but we'll see.


REPLY: [With No Quote] --- [With Quoted Text]

'Rapidlok Findings'
Author:danattacker (guest: search)
Date: Tue, Jun 09th, 2009 @ 01:32 ( . )

I think he will do the interview, but I need to know how the interview will be conducted (via online chat, questionnaire, telephone, etc.). Thanks.


REPLY: [With No Quote] --- [With Quoted Text]

'Rapidlok Findings'
Author:swolff (registered user: 26 posts )
Date: Wed, Jun 10th, 2009 @ 01:37 ( . )

This is really great news! I revisited RapidLok some months ago (thanks to Pete, who supplied me with a dfi-file) and finally got to where I believe I understand it completely (FWIW, what I didn't realize was that the 8-bit weak-byte counter is meant to wrap). As a protection, it's much harder to follow than, say, Vorpal.

[Reminds self to check the c64preservation bbs more often]


REPLY: [With No Quote] --- [With Quoted Text]

'Rapidlok Findings'
Author:swolff (registered user: 26 posts )
Date: Thu, Feb 18th, 2010 @ 02:22 ( . )

I'm hoping this interview is still going to happen...

Pete, do you have "danattacker"'s contact information?


REPLY: [With No Quote] --- [With Quoted Text]

'Rapidlok Findings'
Author:Pete Rittwage (registered user: 558 posts )
Date: Thu, Feb 18th, 2010 @ 08:45 ( . )

Unfortunately, he went dark after this thread.


REPLY: [With No Quote] --- [With Quoted Text]


--- 0 Users Online --- 0 Recent Unique Posters

Q119=1660240090 - Threads: / 1660240090